In social media, populist parties have found the perfect platforms for their deliberate use of misinformation to disturb and emotionalize political debates. In this setting, fact-based discussions have become virtually impossible. To tackle this problem, we are developing an open-source web tool that will empower social media users to investigate and discuss online content and to debunk misinformation collectively.
Before the advent of social media, the power to shape political opinion formation was highly centralized in traditional media. If on the one hand social media have made discussions more democratic and participatory, on the other hand they provide users with actions and reactions that facilitate the diffusion of hate speech and misinformation. This has allowed populist parties to implement very strong and dishonest online strategies.
Our idea is to introduce the right tools for more transparent and fact-based online discussions - which, we believe, is fundamental for democracy. Thereby, we counteract dishonest social media strategies in political debates, bringing about the full potential of social media for participatory and democratic opinion formation.
TraceMap will provide the means to qualify and verify online content. As a consequence, not only would misinformation be inhibited from spreading but the overall quality of information circulating in social media should increase. The collective process of flagging will turn users into information curators, increasing data and digital news literacy.
Once this dynamics is established, misinformation and hate speech will be easily detected, undermining the success of dishonest online strategies and enabling fact-based and respectful political discussions to take place.
1. Data Collection: the database we created already stores Twitter users’ social relations and their tweets.
2. Transparency: we are currently finishing the development of an interactive visualization interface which allows people to navigate through tracemaps - diagrams depicting the diffusion of tweets transparently.
3. Analysis: we will develop a series of functionalities to assist users in their interpretation of what they read - such as hashtag tracking, hate speech flagging or allowing users to rearrange timelines by relevance.
4. Crowd-Debunking: the platform will allow users to interactively flag and share annotations regarding the quality or veracity of a tweet. Thus, we guarantee that fact checking becomes a collective process.
As engaged European citizens, we believe that access to unbiased information is key to democratic participation. TraceMap originated from a think tank for social and digital transformation, where we met and sketched the concept of a tool to combat misinformation on social media. Later on, our idea won the first prize at the #disruptpopulism competition, awarded by the Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung. Ever since, the four of us have been thoroughly working to implement it.
Social media have become central spaces for news consumption and vital for political debates. Therefore, we are carrying out this project for all social media users in Europe, which we split into two broad groups.
The first consists of engaged users: those who proactively detect and flag ill-intentioned content and who seek to contribute to a culture of respectful and fact-based online discussions. The second group represents users who rather consume those flags to interpret online news and political debates.
Our interactive platform is designed to connect political activists, multipliers, journalists, researchers and engaged social media users across Europe in their fight against misinformation and hate speech.
We propose an innovative approach to fight misinformation on social media: instead of focusing on manual content analysis, we visually expose the diffusion of information and give people many tools to do their own research and analyses.
TraceMap empowers users to become change-makers themselves. It is designed to transform the way people consume digital news, from being passive and disoriented readers towards investigative fact checkers who are aware of the mechanisms of digital news.
Not only is our aim to make news diffusion transparent, we are also transparent in our work. Our codes and algorithms are open source.
Funding requested from Advocate Europe
Funding granted from Advocate Europe
We develop our tool in modules. Each module is an independent set of functionalities developed in 3-to-4-month cycles. With the Advocate Europe funding, we will cover the educational program, legal consulting and implement two analysis modules that will already allow us to release the tool. Additional modules will depend on further funding. Personnel costs: 88.200,00 EUR; Content production for educational program: 10.000,00 EUR; Web tool design: 5.000,00 EUR; Legal consulting: 3.000,00 EUR
We'd love your feedback and support! Do you know initiatives working on similar issues in your country? Do you know networks and potential partners for content creation? Do you know how to program? Join our team! Do you have a Twitter account? Donate a token at twitter.tracemap.info!
Today, the discussions around social and political topics are so centered in social media that investigative journalists must track a huge amount of information in there to detect misleading content. Social media analysis has become a fundamental piece of the fact-checking puzzle. For that reason, we spent a bit more than a year developing a digital technology to equip everyone engaged in that fight with better tools to analyze the news.
Three days after we launched our closed beta, a very unpleasant surprise: Twitter blocked our access to its data, claiming (in an automated email) that we had violated the paragraph II.B of the Developer Agreement and Policy and were, therefore, blocked. In the same email they wrote an extra sentence, not present in the above-mentioned agreement:
“Users of your service must specifically initiate and authorize requests made on their behalf (with authorization granted per-request, not as a generic grant of token).”
This extra sentence was where our “violation” took place. And it changes everything. It means all our work to collect tokens was thrown away and we would have to rewrite a big part of our code so that it respects Twitter’s intransparent policy. It also means that our tool would be so slow that it would hardly be of any use to fact-checkers - who require fast tools to keep up with the production of anti-content and debunk them in real time.
Our initial approach was to contact Twitter - also not a trivial task. Despite our good connections to high-rank people in there, the only channel in which they actually answered was the commercial one (which took us a while to try). We followed all necessary steps for enterprises to buy data and they promptly set a meeting, in which they answered our pressing questions: the free Standard API (that we are using) was designed not to work for products; paying for the public data we need is necessary (and expensive and not an option if you’re an NGO); and Twitter is not willing to help us help them with their problem of fake news by facilitating the access to their public data in any way.
But what doesn’t kill you, makes you stronger. We learned during the process that being restricted to the scope of Twitter is, in fact, quite a limitation. There are other Social Media (Facebook-WhatsApp included) in which misinformation is circulating and there are cross-platform phenomena that cannot be ignored in a serious journalistic analysis. We also learned that depending on an API is complicated - for many reasons - and getting rid of that dependency might be necessary. Finally, we learned that our technology is, indeed, helpful for journalists but tools that allow content analysis might be more fundamental.
With all those lessons, we found a radically different approach to continue pursuing our mission. We started an important collaboration that will allow us to move forward with a model that, we believe, is more robust - allowing users to collaboratively analyze, organize and classify content all over the web! This is how our journey continues from now on. We are nevertheless adapting our code to have TraceMap’s tool available, either for people analysing Tweets’ dynamics without any time constraints or to expose to the world how limiting it is to reach Twitter’s data if you don’t have the money.
We started TraceMap to tackle the complex challenge of informing our civil society, countering the mass production of fake news and other misleading forms of content online.
Our mission involves developing digital infrastructures that can empower fact-checkers, journalists, activists and knowledge producers to analyze the news and spread their understanding of the facts. To onboard these actors, we plan to develop workshops for community building and increasing our outreach.
In the first months of this funding period, we developed the first version of our tool (check it out!), which is an open-source tool specifically designed to work on Twitter - the social network known for its political engagement. It displays maps that indicate how information is spreading, rather than analyzing its content. These maps, together with a bunch of metrics and analytic tools, were specifically designed to help our users make sense of the news they're reading.
Collective fact-checking: Tackling the role of social media in the public sphere, this project develops a digital tool where the user community debates, decides and debunks fake news. It’s up to the users to investigate social media content together.